Connections to actual Judiciary branch:
1. The Justices-elect are seen
talking about how their decisions on a case are based on the case and not their
political ideology.
2. The Appointment of a Supreme
Court Justice by the president.
3. The choice of the Justices
are based on their views and if the Senate will pass them or not.
4. The President's administration
finds multiple candidates in case one is not confirmed by the Senate.
5. The President does not
directly pick the Justice, but has a list presented by his administration.
6. A moderate Justice would be
the best choice, but they wanted an even court.
7. The President tries to have
a justice picked who has view that are close to their own, so they are able to
make an impression that will last longer than their presidential term.
8. A
vacant position is usually filled with someone similar to the
previous justice.
Questions:
1. Would such a liberal justice
like, Evelyn Baker Lang, or would she be not even be considered?
2. Does the president have the
same amount of decision power as portrayed?
3. Were the two justices who
were appointed confirmed by the Senate?
4. Would a Republican
Judiciary comity really let such a deal happen?
5. Do many justices act based
on their ideology or are they more moderate/ go case by case?
No comments:
Post a Comment