Facts:
1. Supreme Court went out of their way to say
that they had no interest in the preservation/ abortion, but the legality
of the whole situation.
2. The Supreme Court stated that any state
could regulate abortion, but cannot completely restrict it.
3. The law was created to stop illegal
abortions, because of a concern of women's health during the abortion.
4. Morality rates in women were found to be
significantly less during the first trimester compares to
the morality rates of the other two trimesters.
5. The Court argued that rights to an
abortion can be found in: 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 14th amendments.
6. The Court's decision was not based on the
life of the child, but the life of the parent.
7. Viability has been stated at 24 to 28
weeks into the pregnancy
8. The Court states, "If the State is
interested in protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to
proscribe abortion during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve
the life or health of the mother," implying that states can possibly
prohibit abortion on a case by case basis.
9. The decision was thought to need
regulation, even with the right of privacy involved, some abortion situations/
cases must be regulated.
10. More modern techniques for abortion were
not commonly used until the 1940s and even then it was a tricky business.
Questions:
1. As such a debated topic, if it were to
somehow become illegal, what kind of punishment would be involved, for both
parents, doctors, and others involved?
2. As a guy I don't think I should have too
much of a say in this matter (of course I still have an opinion), but what do
women who have had an abortion, have to say on the topic of regulation of
abortion?
3. Where can we draw the line with matters
like abortion, and say the government should or shouldn't have control over
such an issue?
4. Most people whom have a conservative
ideology are for the death penalty, how can they be "Pro-Life" at the
same time?
5. Was Roe v. Wade considered a social matter
or is it strictly about the health of the parent (according to the Supreme
Court)?
No comments:
Post a Comment